Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Assessing Collaborative Efforts

Assessing participation in a collaborative learning community can be tricky...think about applying the situation to a traditional classroom: if a student never does his homework yet aces every test, should he fail the class? The difference I guess resides with the words 'collaborative' and 'community.' These two terms indicate that learning is a team effort that must have everyone (or most everyone) participating for success. I think some tools to use for assessment include the use of rubrics (that provides standardized expectations for everyone) and a log to track access time. As an online teacher, I have the ability to see how many days my students have logged in during a week, how long they spend online in the classroom, and how long they spend in each individual unit and assignment. Obviously it is not fair to punish other members of the class if some of their peers are not following instructions. However, I do also rely on students vocalizing their concerns. I think this is important for maturity in real world scenarios. All of this aligns to what George Siemens was proposing with his ideas of "participative pedagogy." So this varies from student to student, but various participation forums, like wikis and discussion forums, should put the offer on the table.

When it comes to each student and their particular abilities, I think that "fair and equitable assessment" does depend on what each student first presents to you. When evaluating, as mentioned in the video, it is not a comparison to be made between students. The fair evaluation is seeing how that particular student has improved and demonstrated their learning. Some people are natural over-achievers so their work is always going to stand out, but you cannot grade another child lower for demonstrating their knowledge just not in the same manner. I think this also ties to what Siemens was saying about participative pedagogy when the mentality is to offer varying forms of assessments, not just standardized multiple choice exams.

If a student does not want to participate in a network or collaborative learning community for an online course the first thing that needs to be done is evaluate why the person signed up for the course in the first place. From my experience, I have students who told me that they were completely overwhelmed with the degree of personal discipline you need to have for online courses. I have also had students that were placed in online courses despite efforts from them and their parents to not take the online course. As far as members of the community, I think providing support and encouragement for that person is necessary. Push comes to shove, you have to look at for yourself, but checking up on fellow classmates is a nice thing to do. In fact, an instructor could even pair members up (like we are) to provide that support and motivation. Obviously the instructor as well needs to check with that person to make sure no personal issues are occurring to interfere with that person's performance. As far as affecting one's assessment plan, I think it varies from situation to situation, especially when their is illness or death in the family. But if it is just plain non-participation, the grade should be given according to the rubric.

One comment on a blog site for educators, TeacherLingo.com, caught my attention about the difference between cooperation and collaboration. She states: "“Cooperation is both of us sitting in a sandbox together respecting each other’s space. We are both focused on independent projects inside the same sandbox and occasionally once in a blue moon we might even share a shovel. Collaboration has us both in the same sandbox and not only are we utilizing the same space, sharing the shovel but we are actually working on the same project.” I thought this was very insightful and true about the often confused pairs.



References:

Deich, R. (January 29, 2008). Cooperation vs. Collaboration. Induction Connections: nothing beats growing your own. REtreived July 8, 2009, from http://ness-support.blogspot.com/2008/01/cooperation-vs-collaboration.html.

Siemens, G. (2009). Assessment of collaborative learning. [vodcast]. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com.

2 comments:

Peggy Creighton said...

Erin,
I love the quote you found on the difference between cooperation and collaboration. That is so true, particularly in my job. As a school librarian, I am always looking for teachers to collaborate with me on projects. However, few understand what that truly means. Most are cooperative; few are collaborative. There are always time and turf issues involved, but teacher collaboration on instruction has been shown to be best for students. I am going to take this quote back to my school!

bettysonly said...

Erin, I have encountered a student like that. He didn't do any of the assignments or participated in class and he passed all of the tests. The students really didn't like him for that and I on the other hand had much respect for the student. He did pass, but not with a A or B, I give him a C because it showed he paid attention in the class. If he didn't pay attention he would have passed all of the tests.

W. Jackson